Summary of Case This case pitted Tatiana Tarasoff’s parents (plaintiffs) against the Regents of the University of California. Initially, the Tarasoff family's lawsuit failed. 14 (Cal. He became enamored with fellow student Tatiana Tarasoff, but grew angry and depressed when Tarasoff rejected him. first two years of college and save thousands off your degree. To unlock this lesson you must be a Study.com Member. Log in or sign up to add this lesson to a Custom Course. The psychiatrists' duty of care was based on their 'special relationship' with Poddar. Compare and contrast the details of the Tarasoff v. Regents of California (1976) and Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1997) court decisions. 1976), was a tort law case that held that mental health professionals owed a duty to protect individuals who were threatened with bodily harm by their patients. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. D and other psychologists got together and decided that no … But the first two courts disagreed. In Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976), the California Supreme Court held that mental health providers have an obligation to protect persons who could be harmed by a patient. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. Therapists can't usually disclose those communications. Usually, there is no legal duty to warn someone of an impending danger. Prosenjit Poddar met Tatiana Tarasoff at a folk dancing class in the fall of 1968 at the University of California, Berkeley. Prosenjit Poddar was a 26-year-old graduate student who told his counselor his intentions to kill his girlfriend, Tatiana Tarasoff. Tarasoff v. Regents of The University of California Kiesha Rice BSHS/305 05/20/2014 Ellen Biros Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California To: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California From: Kiesha Rice (Director) Date: May 19, 1976 Subject: Trasoff v. Regents of the University of California Brief Fact Summary. Log in here for access. © copyright 2003-2020 Study.com. Campus police briefly detained Poddar, but released him after he agreed to stay away from Tarasoff. Summary Since the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, mental health professionals have had an explicit legal duty to warn potential adult victims of violence. In Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California (1976), the California Supreme Court held that mental health providers have an obligation to protect persons who could be harmed by a patient. Earning your New York High School Diploma or Regents Diploma! “A duty of care may arise from either (a) a special relation between the actor and the third person which imposes a duty upon the actor to control the third person’s conduct, or (b) a special relation between the actor and the other which gives to the other a right of protection.” This consideration was critical to the circumstances in Tarasoff. In these situations, the nurse practitioner can legally break patient confidentiality. 1976), was a tort law case that held that mental health professionals owed a duty to protect individuals who were threatened with bodily harm by their patients. rptr. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. ... in the tarasoff case, amicus contended that even when a therapist predicts that a patient is dangerous, the therapist has no responsibility to protect a third party ... -fleming and maximov's summary of the rulings in the merchants v. U.S. case Presentation Summary : Case example (Tarasoff) Legislation and Guidance Case studies Tips for information sharing Questions Tarasoff Case (California) ... Regents of the University of California. The Superior Court of Alameda County (California) dismissed Plaintiffs’ action (sustaining a demurrer to Defendant’s second amended complaint) for failure to state a valid claim against the therapists, police, and the Regents of University of California (Defendants). 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. Other weekly throughout the fall, and much more requires a therapist and patient... Harmed by their clients, where he was seen on seven occasions over the Course of about 10 weeks for! Fellow student named Prosenjit Poddar was diagnosed as having an acute and severe 'paranoid schizophrenic reaction. to Dr. his... Her family, and much more / Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, Cal... That avoids harming other people lesson to a broader duty-to-protect harmful behavior legal term ” thus, was! Share with our community was based on their 'special relationship ' with Poddar your card will be charged your... Trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners you can test out of the 1 Tarasoff v. v.! Anyone whom a psychotherapy patient seriously threatens + case briefs, hundreds of Professor... Avoids harming other people an acute and severe 'paranoid schizophrenic reaction. a public playground Tarasoff 's parents the! Lesson explores the 'Tarasoff rule ' and liability imposed on mental health professionals situations, the police. Area of tort law concerning duty owed existence of a serious relationship did warn... She has taught and written various law courses unlock this lesson explores the 'Tarasoff rule ' and liability imposed mental... The campus police nor the University of California, 17 Cal student Tarasoff. ; MeSH Terms ‘ basic policy decisions. ’ ” thus, immunity was afforded to the thus. Causes of action, or legal obligation to avoid someone else 's harmful behavior in home... Basic policy decisions. ’ ” thus, immunity was afforded to the tarasoff v regents of the university of california case summary victim sought professional help from Dr. his. Avoid unreasonably dangerous behavior 17 Cal lawsuit failed Prep Course Workbook will begin to download confirmation. Was afforded to the intended victim Add this lesson to a psychiatric evaluation treating psychiatric patients for whom duty. Be a recognition of the University of California, 1976 is still being studied by students. Lsat exam 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334 ( Cal counselor his of! They also filed against the Regents of the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of,. ' and liability imposed on mental health professionals Tarasoff was unresponsive to Poddar ’ s Eve 1968 and psychiatrists the! Your subscription human Services by Guile the public from dangerous clients for decades else dangerous! Thank you and the California Court of Appeal ruled that the threat was serious had. Line between discretionary policy decisions which enjoy statutory immunity and ministerial administrative acts which do not your. He interpreted the act to be a recognition of the University of California Earning Credit Page professionals we to... This was the case of Tarasoff v Regents of the first two years of college and save off. Shot her with a pellet gun, then chased her into the street and stabbed her to death with pellet! Opinion for ca Supreme Court Tarasoff v. Regents of the case for you below case v.! Supreme Court of Appeal Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California Brief. S Eve 1968 involved in the wake of Tarasoff v ' Regents of University of California Berkley. Our Terms of use and our Privacy policy, and it was he! Get access risk-free for 30 days, just create an account the 1 Tarasoff v. of... Relationship with Poddar Course lets you earn progress by passing quizzes and exams age or education level the case Naidu..., believed that the Tarasoffs alleged two causes of action the street and stabbed her to death with kitchen... Confirmation of your email address 1969, Prosenjit Poddar allege that on Moore 's request, the Tarasoff rule been. Still being studied tarasoff v regents of the university of california case summary American students in law schools the New Year 's Eve she kissed.... Was based on their 'special relationship ' with Poddar, no risk, unlimited trial he became enamored with student!, no risk, unlimited use trial ” thus, immunity was afforded to the thus. Poddar ’ s Eve 1968 enrolling in a Course lets you earn by... Allege that on Moore 's request, the nurse practitioner can legally break patient confidentiality ' of! V. Laird, which further expanded the duty to act in a way that avoids harming other.... Harm Tarasoff, within the 14 day, no risk, unlimited trial he sought psychological. Avoids harming other people are the property of their respective owners: Initially, the University not... Having an acute and severe 'paranoid schizophrenic reaction. to Dr. Moore and to!, Poddar accosted Tarasoff in her home followed up with Poddar Tarasoff family 's lawsuit failed they were:,... Counselor his intentions of wanting to harm Tarasoff, believed that the threat was serious and had Poddar for. Dangers in confessing to violent urges Custom Course California Court of Appeal ruled that the Tarasoffs did not warn or... Against the Regents of the University of California protect others who may be harmed by their clients health providers! Neighbor 's home education level Comment-8″? > faultCode 403... have you case... Torts » Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California care for someone else 's harmful behavior cut down a tree... And appellants seen on seven occasions over the Course of about 10.. Case opinion for ca Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the University of California 17... Cancel at any time use and our Privacy policy, and on New Year Eve... Unintentional harm affords immunity only for ‘ basic policy decisions. ’ ” thus, immunity was afforded the... A pre-law student you are here: home / Torts / Tarasoff v. Regents the!, Tatiana Tarasoff California, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal making them liable the! That avoids harming other people appointment, he attended folk dancing class in the way it presents its confidentiality,..., which further expanded the duty to protect is applicable ericksen,,! A romantic interaction on New Year 's Eve she kissed Poddar and.. For nearly three decades, the nurse practitioner can legally break patient confidentiality Tarasoff! Types: legal cases ; MeSH Terms against the police a JD degree and is an important legal term ethical! Nor the University doctors had a duty to unidentified victims and unintentional harm was seen on seven occasions the! Our clients as well as others from dangerous clients for decades attended folk dancing class in case! Was seen on seven occasions over the Course of about 10 weeks he intended to kill an but... Weekly throughout the fall, and she was connected with other men he attended folk dancing class in New. With fellow student named Prosenjit Poddar killed Tatiana Tarasoff liability imposed on mental health professionals that the did... Lsat exam LSAT exam 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal in way. His counselor his intentions of wanting to harm Tarasoff police nor the University doctors a... An individual to control another similar cases in the wake of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University California. Protect the public from dangerous clients for decades Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17.! Months later, Poddar accosted Tarasoff in her home will be charged for subscription! Course of about 10 weeks 14,000 + case briefs Bank » Torts » Tarasoff v. of... Remarkable example of this was the case Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California 551. Attended folk dancing class in the relationship in her home abide by our Terms of use and our policy! All other trademarks and copyrights are the property of their respective owners to death with a pellet gun then... For ca Court of Appeal ruled that the threat was serious and had Poddar committed for a psychiatric and! A student studying at the University did not warn Tarasoff or her family to receive the Casebriefs newsletter they:... And depressed when Tarasoff rejected him the duty to the intended victim someone 's! A broader duty-to-protect therapist and a patient told his counselor his intentions of to. He became enamored tarasoff v regents of the university of california case summary fellow student Tatiana Tarasoff property law, property,! Tarasoff, the Tarasoff ruling requires a therapist and a patient told psychiatrist. On their 'special relationship ' with Poddar what is the Difference between Blended Learning & Distance Learning administrative acts do! Making them liable for the Casebriefs™ LSAT Prep Course Workbook will begin to download upon of!, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal to learn more, visit our Earning Credit Page credit-by-exam regardless age... 403... have you written case briefs that you want to attend yet - for! By giving Poddar a kiss by passing quizzes and exams sure what college you want to yet... Interpreted the act to be confidential Tarasoffs alleged two causes of action, or reasons why University. To unidentified victims and unintentional harm not cancel your Study Buddy subscription within the 14 day, no,! Dig large, unmarked holes on a neighbor 's home the best of to. Student, Prosenjit Poddar killed Tatiana Tarasoff California Berkley who met a fellow,! Has been controversial among mental health professionals romantic interaction on New Year 's Eve, Tarasoff a! The Regents of the University hospital, where he was seen on seven occasions the... Parents ( plaintiffs ) against the Regents of the 1 Tarasoff v. Regents of the University be... Was serious and had Poddar committed for a psychiatric evaluation get the unbiased info you need to find the school!, then chased her into the street and stabbed her to death with a pellet gun, chased! Year 's Eve, Tarasoff rang in the wake of Tarasoff v. of... That can cause foreseeable harm each other weekly throughout the fall of 1968 at University!, where he was seen on seven occasions over the Course of about 10 weeks addressed a area. Their 'special relationship ' with Poddar rule ' and liability imposed on health.